I was going around the codex and I noticed that sentinels give ONLY 150 xp on kill. For comparison a single tac model gives 230 xp and a GK rhino gives 350 xp, a single warp spider gives 150 xp... This doesn't seem right, maybe the info is bad but if it's right it should be changed.

Well I thank you this Codex thingy is really handy.

http://www.dawnofwar.info/index.php?pag ... rp_spiders

Their is a problem with the warp spiders' production and reinforcement costs I think.

Could we possibly rename Heretics to ' Cultists '. The reason I suggest this is because the term 'Heretic' is a too broad. Furthermore, it would be great if we could rename Kasrkin to Grenadiers . The reason for this is that Kasrkin generally stick close to Cadian regiments. The generalised name wi...

Discreet wrote:

Nurland wrote:Fracku Jacketto

?

aka Flack Jacket

Sorry, but ALOT of games do adaptive changes just like this. I'm not sure I can convience you to think otherwise. Hell, Lord General gets an AoE 30% damage reduction + immune to knockback/knockdown in T1. That's a global Fortune, why isnt' anyone shitting their pants about that? :twisted: Well here...

1. I can read a thing just once and remember it during a reasonable length of time thank you very much.

2. Even more reasons to put my opinion out as it's more likely to result in a correction of these changes.

In t3, if you're against an eldar DO NOT get neither terminators or Land Raiders, is just sad how stupidly easy eldar can deal with termies or LRs, you'll probably will have to go dev spam or predators against eldar. Can you give exemples for termies because I really don't think they are that easy ...

This weapon was just fine. It's a heavy melee weapon on a support commander. You can also use guide on herself to buff the damage even further. Guided, It will do more damage than most of the aggressive commanders with their heavy melee weapons (FC PF, WB claw, ~8 DPS under the HT claws, etc). And ...

Actually with the current build the AI is not inactive anymore and produces units.

These changes sound really good in general I especially approve of these : * Mark Target damage amplifier reduced from 50% to 40% Sounds more reasonable, I like it. * Great Unclean One damage increased from 160 to 200 * Great Unclean One no deals splash damage with his regular melee hit * Avatar dam...

The best games to study are generally those where you feel like you did well and still got stomped. Then it's a good idea to study your opponent's play to see where he outplayed you and took the advantage.

Dark Eldar are not going to leech out the souls of deamons since they are doing it precisely to avoid having to deal with daemons (and slaanesh in particular).

To be fair TCSM make any upgradedT1/T2 ranged squad look pathetic in comparison, they are more the exception than the rule as far as power armor units go.

I'm all for reducing sync kills too, I can't remember how many time my wraithlord took a half an hour to gib one poor heretic when he could have splashed down the whole squad.

dabane wrote:And what kind of build is it? Slugga Zerg rush or something else?

Man if you take SC2 as a comparison point for DoW 2 you're gonna have trouble figuring it out.

I don't know, these changes look like they will make Sniper and to a larger extent Ranger plays not particularly worthwhile. Scouts will have what, 180 damage spread over 13 seconds instead of the 170 over 12 they have now, which is alright. Their upfront damage is less which seems to be counter-in...

I main eldar and I really like them but their background makes them look very homogeneous so I'm ok with the lack of "DLCs" for them. I'd really like to see the Emperor's Children tho, make it four for chaos .

I really don't like these changes. First thing snipers squad are not able to oneshot level 1 guardmen (much better against ig right...) really ? It would not be a problem before because you didn't want to shoot at GM anyway but now that they are supposedly better against gm and nids... sure. Who car...

Are you seriously prosposing double shees as a valid build ?

Ultrasmurfs yay... no.

Actually I would support it too. Being able to halt fire on pdevs without having to mismantle would be great and would save the life of many ASM in the world, among other melee squads/commanders.

Waiting for Hive Fleet Ctuhlu !

In my mind CL always stood for chaos lord and LC for commissar lord (or lord commissar) but i agree this could be changed to settle both matters once and for all.

Dalakh

Steam Account

CL,WSE,Inq

Your banner would work very well for a Deathwatch kill team I feel.

Summoning deamon through psykers ok. But do you seriously see an eldar summoning any kind of deamon willingly to serve them ? don't think so, even dark eldars wouldn't do that.

Rangers are best used to retake ground. Poke at your ennemy until he backs off enough or he attacks you and then you counter iniate on your strong position (shields shuri shees and all) and force him off.

Hey Swift, you know my level if you want some 1v1 just invite me on steam when I'm around.

Purgs have it because they can only really deal with 1 or 2 melee squads at the same at best. Often only 1. They have low hp so if they didn't have it any flanking melee would easily kill them. That was my first guess and it makes sense but I think they should lose the melee resist when they upgrad...